Craftrule Limited v 41-60 Albert Palace Mansions (Freehold) Limited


Reference:
[2011] EWCA Civ 185, [2011] 1 P & CR 394

Date:
24th February 2011

Court:
Court of Appeal

Comment:

The language of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 s.3 was clear: divisibility of a self-contained part of a building was neither expressly nor impliedly required in order to satisfy the definition of "premises" to which the enfranchisement provisions applied under s.3(2).


Practice Areas:

© New Square Chambers Ltd