Procedural vandalism and the Solicitors Act 1974: Carpmaels & Ransford LLP and Collyer Bristow LLP v Regen Lab SA [2021] 2 WLUK 244

Publication Date

09 Mar 2021

Description

James McKean represented the Claimants, two firms of solicitors and intellectual property lawyers, who resisted an application to set aside a default judgment.

The Claimants were owed fees in excess of £600,000, having represented the Defendant, a Swiss biotechnology company, in the Regen Lab SA v Estar Medical Limited [2019] EWHC 63 (Pat) patent litigation.

The Defendant acknowledged service but failed to file a defence or contest jurisdiction. Default judgment was obtained.

The Defendant’s application to set aside the judgment consisted of a jurisdictional challenge and technical objections under the Solicitors Act 1974 to the bills submitted by the Claimants. Waksman J found these arguments to have no prospects of success and refused the Defendant relief from sanctions.

To read the full article, please click here.

Contributors

James McKean

Practice Areas

Commercial Litigation